"If we are successful, we will have done more than any equalization can do."
- Brad Wall commenting after a First Ministers meeting, January 12, 2008
Van Mulligen says the bill provides for greater transparency and would allow the people of Saskatchewan an easy way to determine for themselves the amount of federal assistance flowing to the province.
Van Mulligen believes this new legislation to be necessary and points to the Sask Party’s refusal to follow through on the Constitutional Challenge on Equalization as a prime example of why. The Premier has previously said that by dropping the court challenge, a more constructive relationship with the federal government could be forged which would pay larger dividends to the province than the estimated $800 million per year than was promised through Equalization.
The need for the bill was highlighted by the Sask Party’s insistence on misleading the public on how much money it receives from the Harper government. Highways and Infrastructure Critic Ron Harper raised the case of Brad Wall stating that recent funding for a bridge in Saskatoon is “outside of what every other province gets.” In actual fact, the money to fund the bridge is available to every other province in Canada.
“The provincial government has so far had a hard time communicating the benefits of this so-called friendly relationship to the people of our province,” Harper said. “If a separate document detailing the amount and purpose of federal transfers is created, perhaps the premier and the Sask Party will have an easier time explaining how new and unique federal funds will add up to over $800 million per year.”
Other Stories
View the full news archives here
Under the Wall government we went from having $2.3 billion in the bank to a $1.05 billion deficit in less than 2 years
"`Have you got a visit from the police yet?’ I think that was my exact comment."
- Minister of Corrections, Public Safety and Policing Yogi Huyghebaert
Wall Government unwilling or unable to answer questions...
December 1, 2009
Even more legitimately maddening was the remarkable hubris of Advanced Education, Manpower and Labour Minister Rob Norris and his staff, who seemed unwilling or still unable to answer issues raised by the unions at the hearings last summer. There again, if a government is intent on jamming legislation through anyway, should we be surprised it didn't attempt to answer questions? Unfortunately this is what happens when governments get a little too eager to do the bidding of their supporters. It tends to lead to trouble. -Murray Mandryk, The Leader-Post


